ARCHIVE SITE - Last updated Jan. 19, 2017. Please visit www.NACWA.org for the latest NACWA information.
ARCHIVE SITE - Last updated Jan. 19, 2017. Please visit www.NACWA.org for the latest NACWA information.
|
|
Administration’s Budget Signals Shift in Water Investment Priorities
The proposed cut to the CWSRF pays for other Administration priorities elsewhere in the Administration’s EPA budget, including an increase of $158 million for the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) program and $240 million more for enforcement efforts. Even in the wake of Flint, the proposed increase to the DWSRF is less than what the Administration proposed last year. While NACWA supports an increase for the DWSRF, there also must be an increase in the CWSRF – especially given EPA’s own recent clean water needs survey showing a $270 billion need for clean water investment. Now is the time to be increasing the federal investment in water infrastructure, not cutting investment. Additional details on the budget request are available in Advocacy Alert 16-03 The Administration’s budget request also contains funding for a $300 million initiative to invest in water innovation technology focused on dealing almost exclusively with water supply challenges caused by western drought. Monies would fund such things as technology development to increase water and energy efficiency measures at water treatment plants. There is a particular focus on reducing the cost and energy intensity of desalination technology; increasing water conservation efforts; developing new drought assessments; and promoting basic water supply research. While NACWA is supportive of investing in water innovation and research, increasing funding for these efforts while also dramatically cutting funds for the federal government’s primary water infrastructure investment programs demonstrates a stunning lack of awareness of the most important water investment priorities currently facing the nation. This is particularly true in light of the crisis in Flint, where the precarious state of our nation’s water infrastructure has been painfully exposed. Members of Congress from both political parties have already denounced the Administration’s proposed cuts to the SRF, and Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD) has introduced a bill that would triple investments in both the CWSRF and DWSRF. Budget negotiations will now shift to Capitol Hill, where NACWA will strongly advocate against the Administration’s proposed SRF cuts. There will be additional discussion of the budget at NACWA’s upcoming Winter Conference, and we will keep the membership updated on developments. New House Bill Highlights Congressional Focus On Low Income Rate Assistance
This is the second bill introduced in as many weeks in Congress seeking to promote federal financial assistance programs for low income ratepayers related to water and sewer services. Last week, a bipartisan water trust fund bill was introduced in the House calling for a congressional study of the affordability challenges facing low income populations, including what role the federal government can play in helping to incentivize pricing that reflects the true value of water. These two bills indicate Congress’ clear interest in further exploring how the federal government can provide additional financial help to low income ratepayers while also empowering drinking water and clean water utilities to raise the revenue necessary for needed infrastructure investments. NACWA is currently working with other major water sector organizations on a collaborative effort to examine ratepayer assistance and subsidy program models in use today, with a specific focus on the constitutional, statutory, regulatory, and policy underpinnings of these various models at the state and local levels. The report will provide a state-by-state analysis of existing programs, the legal frameworks that support them, and the specific legal or regulatory barriers to the use of alternative rate structures. NACWA’s participation in the project is being supported by the Association’s Targeted Action Fund. A Request for Proposals was issued in January and the project is expected to be underway in the coming months. Water Sector Groups Talk Flint, EPA Budget With Water Office Chief
EPA stressed that the situation in Flint was a “significant leadership opportunity” for the water sector to ensure that needed actions are taken by the utility community to prevent similar situations in the future. From a regulatory perspective, the Agency is focused on making sure that the rules on the books for sampling and corrosion control are being followed. EPA also encouraged the water sector organizations to look for opportunities to “step up” and go beyond compliance to provide the best product for their communities. EPA acknowledged that the crisis raises important affordability questions, noting that some citizens in Flint are already paying 7-8% of their median household income on water. The Agency also noted that Flint will be front and center as it works to revise its existing lead and copper regulations, a process that started before the details of the crisis came to light. During discussion on EPA’s FY 2017 budget request, NACWA expressed its disappointment in the Administration’s request for the Clean Water State Revolving Fund and the conflicting messages the overall budget sends on water – requesting additional funding for innovative projects and expanded desalination, but decreasing funding for the key programs used to upgrade existing infrastructure (see preceding article for more details). Beauvais and Andrew Sawyers, Director of the Office of Wastewater Management, will both be in San Diego for NACWA’s Winter Conference later this month to continue the dialogue. Dispute Over Flint Funding Stalls Energy Bill
Senate Hearing Raises Infrastructure Investment Concerns
As anticipated, the developments in Flint, Michigan steered the WRDA discussion toward water infrastructure. Sen. Boxer kicked off this line of discussion by noting that while Flint was a treatment issue, it nonetheless is focusing needed attention to the importance of water infrastructure investment. Many of her Democratic colleagues followed suit, raising their own concerns about water investment and their desire to address infrastructure investment through a 2016 WRDA bill. Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) expressed interest in working on a Senate companion bill to H.R. 4468, the Water Infrastructure Trust Fund Act introduced by Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) last week, and that he would like to include the Trust Fund proposal in WRDA. NACWA and the Water Infrastructure Network (WIN) followed up with Sen. Booker’s staff and will be discussing the bill, including the Trust Fund and the affordability study called for in the legislation, with his office again in coming days. Similarly, NACWA is anticipating an effort to address SRF authorization and reform through the WRDA process. Sen. Cardin’s office is leading efforts on the SRFs in the Senate. The Administration’s proposed cuts to the SRF in light of the Flint crisis have clearly struck a nerve in Congress (see related article), and the WRDA bill will likely provide a vehicle for Congress to address these concerns. The high level of interest in addressing these and other infrastructure issues through WRDA may mean a slower and more complicated process to move the bill forward than originally anticipated. Senate and House leadership, however, continue to express their interest in maintaining regular order and passing a 2016 WRDA bill. NACWA will continue to stay closely involved in WRDA discussions as they advance. Association members wishing to weigh in on WRDA are asked to contact This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it . Senate Drought Bill Introduced; Funding Announced
On a related note, on February 8 the Bureau of Reclamation announced it has made available $166 million of remaining FY 2016 funding for drought response and rural water projects. The majority of the funds are allocated toward specific projects, while a combined $22.6 million will go toward the Title XVI program; WaterSMART Grants; Drought Response and Comprehensive Drought Planning; and the Cooperative Watershed Management Program. However, compared to the extent of projects seeking Title XVI funds, the funding will go just a small way to addressing the West’s significant water recycling and reuse opportunities – and, due to the congressional authorization hurdle, only previously authorized Title XVI projects are eligible for this FY 2016 funding. The congressional authorization restriction would be lifted under the bill introduced by Sen. Feinstein.
Clean Power Plan Rule Put On Hold
NACWA filed comments NACWA Brings Clean Water Message To New York
Utility executives noted the need to raise water and sewer rates to maintain investment in their systems, but also the challenges this presents to their low income rate payers. NACWA CEO Adam Krantz and Chief Advocacy Officer Nathan Gardner-Andrews discussed the importance of this issue at a national level, noting the Association’s work with other water sector organizations to examine rate assistance programs for low income populations – and recent congressional interest in providing additional financial help to low income households. NACWA’s representatives also gave a brief update on a number of current advocacy issues from the national perspective, including a recent congressional ban on microbeads and EPA’s proposed changes to the Phase II stormwater regulations. NYWEA and a number of New York utilities were recognized for their support in defeating dangerous legislation that would have impacted combined sewer overflows and blending in the Great Lakes. NACWA thanks NYWEA for the opportunity to participate in the meeting and is always interested in speaking with state and regional clean water groups around the county. NACWA Releases Analysis On Tiered Water Rates
In an April 2015 decision, a California appellate court rejected the use of tiered rates for water service in Capistrano Taxpayers Association, Inc. v. City of San Juan Capistrano. The water rates at issue gradually increased based on usage, with the highest rates imposed on the highest users. The rates were not based on a corresponding increased cost to serve higher volume users, but were instead an attempt to encourage water conservation in the drought-stricken region. The court struck down the City’s rates based on a California constitutional amendment requiring that rates not exceed the cost of providing service to a given property, holding that while tiered rates are permissible, the rates must nonetheless be based on the cost of providing service to a given tier. NACWA conducted a detailed analysis of the precedent on the use of tiered rates for sewer service nationwide, and the potential impact of the Capistrano decision. Absent a significant paradigm shift or sweeping constitutional amendments across the country, it is unlikely that the Capistrano decision will have a significant impact outside of California. While the decision may place a higher burden on California utilities to establish that rates are based on cost to serve a given tier, other states are unlikely to follow suit. Instead, courts across the country have resoundingly supported tiered rates, so long as they are equitable and non-discriminatory. In addition, courts have consistently held that cost need not be the only factor to be considered in rate setting, and that utilities are given a great deal of deference to determine a reasonable method of establishing rates. This is true in the context of both water and sewer rates. Webinar To Focus On Tribal Involvement In TMDL Program
Plan Now To Be Part of Water Week 2016
Amy Walter, the national editor of the Cook Political Report and the former political director at ABC News, will kick off the National Water Policy Forum & Fly-In. Over the past 14 years, she has built a reputation as an accurate, objective, and insightful analyst with unparalleled access to campaign insiders and decision-makers. Her analysis has earned her numerous accolades. Her remarks on the electoral process, congressional culture, Washington political scene, and the issues important to the water sector is sure to be both timely and compelling. Water Week 2016, presented by the NACWA, the Water Environment Federation (WEF), the Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) and the WateReuse Association, will feature distinguished speakers, conference sessions, Capitol Hill visits, and regulatory roundtables. It’s not too early make plans to attend. Hotel reservations are open at the Westin Washington DC City Center – and Forum registration will be available next week. Don’t miss this opportunity to add your voice to those of your colleagues nationwide. US Water Prize Nominations Open
Winning Science Fair Project Creates Interest In Energy/Water NexusGuest blogger Matthew Kaiser, information officer for Fairfax County, Virginia’s Department of Public Works & Environmental Services, discusses how a pair of high school students took on the energy/water nexus and ended up with a winning entry in the Fairfax County Regional Science & Engineering Fair. How did these students partner with the utility and wow the judges? Read on to find out more.
|
Membership gives you access to the tools to keep you up to date on legislative, regulatory, legal and management initiatives.
Winter Conference
Next Generation Compliance …Where Affordability & Innovation Intersect
February 4 – 7, 2017
Tampa Marriott Waterside Hotel ![]()
Tampa, FL