ARCHIVE SITE - Last updated Jan. 19, 2017. Please visit www.NACWA.org for the latest NACWA information.
ARCHIVE SITE - Last updated Jan. 19, 2017. Please visit www.NACWA.org for the latest NACWA information.
|
|
August 9, 2013 NACWA Defends Miami-Dade County Proposed Consent DecreeNACWA submitted a comment letter The proposed Miami-Dade decree establishes a framework to maximize public health and environmental benefits, and achieve compliance with the Clean Water Act (CWA), without requiring unnecessary expenditures of limited local ratepayer dollars. A number of local environmental stakeholder groups have, however, intervened in the related judicial proceedings and argued that the proposed decree should be revised to deal more directly with climate change factors. NACWA’s comments acknowledge that potential climate change impacts can be important considerations for utilities in long-range planning, but also fully support the decision of EPA, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and Miami-Dade County that such considerations are not required to ensure CWA compliance – and that the proposed decree is not the appropriate tool to address climate change. The comments further note that Miami-Dade has already taken significant steps to plan for the impacts of climate change, entering the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact with a number of surrounding counties in 2009. The Compact partners work together to mitigate the causes and adapt to the consequences of climate change, including the potential for sea level rise and the resulting impacts on water and wastewater service. Given the evolving scientific understanding of climate change – and the need to adapt quickly to changing circumstances – the County’s plan to address climate issues through the Compact (and other adaptive approaches) is much more practical and effective than using a more rigid federal wet weather consent decree and court order. No other federal consent decree has been altered by a District Court over the objections of the parties that negotiated it to include climate change considerations, and NACWA does not believe this decree should be the first. NACWA is always willing to provide comments on proposed decree or other enforcement orders for Association members when such action would be helpful and appropriate. Members may contact Amanda Water at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or Nathan Gardner-Andrews at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it for additional information.
NACWA, Water Sector Groups Briefed on Ammonia Criteria Revisions, Key EPA RulesDuring its regular, bi-monthly discussion with top EPA Office of Water officials, NACWA and representatives from key water sector organizations were briefed on the Agency’s forthcoming release of its revised aquatic life criteria for ammonia – and several other rules and that will impact the clean water community. The group learned that EPA plans to release the final revised ammonia criteria this month. Since EPA proposed the revisions in 2009, the Agency has reviewed more than 1,000 new studies on ammonia toxicity, including several indicating that freshwater snails exhibit similar sensitivity to ammonia as freshwater mussels. EPA’s proposed revision had included separate criteria calculation equations for waters where mussels are present or absent, but with the new data on snail toxicity the final criteria will include a single equation to calculate the criteria value based on pH and temperature. Based on recommendations from NACWA, EPA delayed release of the criteria to allow time to develop three implementation documents: 1) guidance on recalculating criteria on a site-specific basis; 2) guidance on the flexibility available for implementing the criteria (addressing variances, designated use changes, and compliance schedules); and, 3) guidance to help states determine whether sensitive species are present and whether site-specific criteria might be appropriate. NACWA will alert the membership when the criteria documents are released. EPA also provided updates on its post-construction stormwater rule, the forthcoming water quality standards rule, and the NPDES electronic reporting rule. The Agency continues to work on the stormwater rule, preparing it for submittal to the Office of Management & Budget (OMB). There is no public timetable at this point, as EPA continues to negotiate with the Chesapeake Bay Foundation on a revised schedule under the settlement agreement driving the rule’s development. EPA indicated that Administrator McCarthy has expressed an interest in the rule and requested a briefing in the near future on the options the Agency is considering. The water quality standards rule, which proposes revisions in six main areas to the Agency’s existing regulations (i.e. administrator determinations, designated uses, triennial reviews, antidegradation, variances, and compliance schedules) is being prepared for signature. Once it is released in the Federal Register, EPA will accept comments on the rule for 90 days. The Agency is planning to hold two webinars and one public meeting during the comment period, and NACWA will alert the membership when the rule is released. Finally, EPA briefly discussed the NPDES electronic reporting rule. The Office of Enforcement & Compliance Assurance, not the Office of Water, is developing the rule, but water office officials are nevertheless following the regulation carefully. The rule was published in the Federal Register on July 30 and NACWA will be releasing an Advocacy Alert on the proposal next week. NACWA Moves Forward with Congressional Clean Water Caucus |
Membership gives you access to the tools to keep you up to date on legislative, regulatory, legal and management initiatives.
Winter Conference
Next Generation Compliance …Where Affordability & Innovation Intersect
February 4 – 7, 2017
Tampa Marriott Waterside Hotel ![]()
Tampa, FL